Predictive tests of difficult airway and cormack- lehane classification in adults. ¿myth or reality?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/rceucs.v10i1.17589

Keywords:

anesthesia, classification, intubation

Abstract

Airway management is of concern for the anesthesiologist and it is their duty to anticipate difficulties in performing intubation. There are multiple tests to predict the difficult airway. Objective: To describe the results between the Mallampati scale, interincisor distance, sternomental distance and neck circumference and the Cormack- Lehane scale to anticipate a difficult airway. Patients and Methods: Quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study; The data was obtained through the application of a questionnaire at the Doctor Mario Catarino Rivas National Hospital. A total of 50 patients over 18 years of age. Results: On the Mallampati scale, 4 (44%) they were difficult intubation according to the results of Cormack-Lehane scale. In the opening greater than 3 cm, 32 (94%) were easy intubation. Of the patients with sternomental distance greater than 13 cm, 41 (89.1%) underwent easy intubation.In neck thickness less than or equal to 36 cm, 32 (94%) were easy intubation. Conclusion: When comparing the results of predictive tests for difficult airway and the Cormack-Lehane classification, it was found that the scales of Mallampati and mouth opening were similar with the Cormack-Lehane classification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
105
PDF (Español (España)) 92

Author Biography

Martha Molina, National Autonomous University of Honduras of the Sula Valley

Fourth-year resident of the postgraduate course in Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and
Pain at the National Autonomous University of Honduras in the Sula Valley.

Published

2024-03-12

How to Cite

Molina Caballero, M. C. M. C. (2024). Predictive tests of difficult airway and cormack- lehane classification in adults. ¿myth or reality?. Revista Científica De La Escuela Universitaria De Las Ciencias De La Salud, 10(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.5377/rceucs.v10i1.17589