Dialogue of Knowledge, a look from our own and decolonial methodological pluralism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5377/rci.v34i2.20544Keywords:
Knowledge, research, etymological tracingAbstract
This article emerges as part of a reflection of the research methodologies that have persisted in the face of Eurocentric methodologies. The purpose of this article is to discuss methodological aspects and ways of conducting research based on the Cultivation and Nurturing of Wisdom and Knowledge (CCRISAC), from an Indigenous and Eurocentric perspective, describing etymological tracing as a form of own research of peoples and communities. The methodology implemented for this process was a documentary and content review, which allowed for the examination and comparison of the authors' different positions regarding research methods.
It is concluded that, based on methodological pluralism, etymological tracing constitutes a fundamental tool for linguistic inquiry, helping to obtain more precise meanings from contexts, as well as their use and applicability in a given community or society.
Downloads
147
HTML (Español (España)) 12
Resumen.mp3 (Español (España)) 56
Abstract.mp3 (Español (España)) 49
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 URACCAN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © (URACCAN)

This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This license allows others to download the works and share them with others, as long as their authorship is acknowledged, but they can not be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.