Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in contrast-induced neprhotoxicity in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization

Authors

  • José Casco Raudales Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  • Alexandre C. Zago Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  • Márcia F. de Casco Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
  • Marco A. Bortolini Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
  • Isabella C. Flores Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Keywords:

renal function, contrast media, contrast-induced nephrotoxicity, glomerular filtration rate, creatinine

Abstract

Introduction: The study aim was to asses if the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by the Cockroft-Gault method offers better approaching than serum creatinine levels (CrS) for detecting contrast-induced nephropathy in patients (PS) exposed to contrast media. Method: 133 PS with basal CrS level up 1.2 mg/dL who underwent cardiac catheterization (CC) were enrolled into the study and CrS blood levels were measured before and 48 h after the procedure. Results: In basal settings, PS were distributed in two groups: Group I (GFR<60 mL/min, n=15) and Group II (GFR≥60 mL/min, n=118). When comparing each other, Group I PS shown higher CrS level (1.01 ± 0.14 vs 0.88 ± 0.18 mg/dL; P=0.007) and lower GFR (49.1 ± 6.7 vs 101.1 ± 29.9 mL/min; P<0.0001) than Group II; PS were old-aged (P=0.006), mostly female gender, lower weight (P<0.0001) and height. Forty eight hours after CC, 20.3% PS met NTIC criteria. Again, PS were stratified in two different groups: with nephrotoxicity (CPFR, n=27) and without nephrotoxicity (SPFR, n=106); in CPFR group the CrS raised from 0.80 ± 0.20 to 1.10 ± 0.23 mg/dL (P=0.0001) while GFR fell from 98.1 ± 46.0 to 69.8 ± 31.0 mL/min (P=0.0001). Conclusions: The GFR assessed by Cockcroft-Gault method was more efficient and faster than CrS levels to asses renal function before contrast media exposure, and allowed patients identification with normal CrS levels but with some degree of renal dysfunction (prevalence of 11.3%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
51
PDF (Español (España)) 37

Author Biographies

José Casco Raudales, Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

MD PhD

Alexandre C. Zago, Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

MD PhD

Márcia F. de Casco, Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

RN

Marco A. Bortolini, Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

MSc

Isabella C. Flores, Centro de Investigación Cardiovascular y/o del laboratorio de Hemodinamia del Hospital Luterano (ULBRA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

MVZ

Published

2014-09-20

How to Cite

Raudales, J. C., Zago, A. C., de Casco, M. F., Bortolini, M. A., & Flores, I. C. (2014). Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in contrast-induced neprhotoxicity in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Revista Médica Hondureña, 82(3), 104–110. Retrieved from https://camjol.info/index.php/RMH/article/view/12877

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS ORIGINALES