Effect of instrumental noise in the potentiometric determination of chlorides using as a selective electrode a discarded glass electrode

Authors

  • National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon
  • National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon
  • National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/universitas.v7i2.13870

Keywords:

Determination of chlorides with discarded glass electrodes, Uncertainty in the determination of chlorides

Abstract

The present study aims to demonstrate the effect of digital voltmeter noise on potentiometric determinations of chlorides, using discarded glass electrodes as selective indicators of chloride ions. A simulation program was developed in Maple 18 that calculates the noise in the measurements of chloride concentrations, considering voltmeters with resolutions of 1, 0.1 and .001 mV. In the program, a deviation of the nominal volume of the volumetric used in the additions of the standards was introduced, in order to simulate the systematic errors of an uncalibrated volumetric. The minimum potential differences that must exist were estimated in order to differentiate two successive concentrations. These values were 19, 2.9 and 1.2 mV, respectively, for the previous voltmeters. The calibration model was simulated for a resolution of 1 mV, voltmeter available in the laboratory, and compared with the experimental model obtained with a discarded glass electrode. The method was applied to the chloride determinations in physiological saline and in a sample of drinking water, using direct calibration and standard addition. The uncertainties were evaluated applying two calculation methods: the propagation of the uncertainties and the simulation of Monte Carlo, which led to recommend the use of a voltmeter with better resolution to obtain results with greater precision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
192
pdf (Español (España)) 124

Author Biographies

, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon

National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon (UNAN-Leon) Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Chemistry Department Heavy Metal Trace Analysis Laboratory (LATMP)

, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon

National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon (UNAN-Leon) Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Chemistry Department Heavy Metal Trace Analysis Laboratory (LATMP)

, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon

National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon (UNAN-Leon) Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Chemistry Department Heavy Metal Trace Analysis Laboratory (LATMP)

References

DURST, R.A., (2012), “Ion Selective Electrode. The Early Years”, Electroanalysis, Vol. 24, 1, pag. 15–22.

PATAKI, L. ZAAP, E. (1980), Basic Analytical Chemistry, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pag. 321.

WANG, J., (2011), Analytical Electrochemistry, 2a edición, John Wiley, pag 140.

CAMMANN, K., (1979), Working with ion selective electrodes, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pag. 162.

BUCK, R.P., (1978), Ions selective electrodes, Anal. Chem., Vol. 50, 5, 17R-29R.

MIDGLEY D., TORRANCE K., (1978), Potentiometric Water Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Londres, pag. 341.

Federation, W. E., & American Public Health Association. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA.

Fisher Scientific, (2002), “Cloride Half-Cell Ion Selective Electrodes”, Instructions 256-192-001 Rev B.

Zosky C.G, (2007), “Handbook of Electrochemistry”, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Pag. 273.

MEIER P y ZUND R, (2000), “Statistical Methods in Analytical Chemistry”, John Wiley, N.Y. pag. 230.

BARD A y FULKNER L, (2001), “Electrochemistry methods: fundamentals and applications”, 2a edición, NY, pag. 808.

KIMOTHI S.A., (2002), “The uncertainty of measurments”, ASQ Quality Press, Wisconsin, pag. 59.

SKOOG D.A., WEST D., (2014), Fundamentals of analytical chemistry, Brooks/Cole, USA, pag. 279.

SAWYER D., (1974), Experimental Electrochemistry experimental, John Wiley, NY, pag. 172

IUPAC, (2013), Atomics weights of the elements, Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 85, 5, 1047-1078.

DELGADO G. y NAGEL B., (2008), Un experimento sencillo para evaluar la incertidumbre siguiendo la guía GUM ISO 1995 y utilizando el cálculo simbólico MAPLE 11.0”, Universitas UNAN-León, Vol 1, 2, 19-26.

BIPM, IEC, IFCC, IUPAC, OIML (1995:2008). Guide for to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), ISO, Ginebra.

DELGADO G., (2002), “Metodología para la implementación del método adaptativo de Montecarlo en la evaluación de la incertidumbre de la medición”, Universitas UNAN-León, Vol 3, 2, 22-32.

NOM-127–SSA1-1994, (2000), Modificación a Norma Oficial Mexicana. salud.gob.mx/unidades/cdi/nom/m127ssa14.html. Acceso 21/11/14.

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Gustavo, Arelia, & Jairo. (2016). Effect of instrumental noise in the potentiometric determination of chlorides using as a selective electrode a discarded glass electrode. Universitas (León): Revista Científica De La UNAN León, 7(2), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.5377/universitas.v7i2.13870

Issue

Section

Articles