Approximation to the dogmatic of the judicial individualization of the internment measure

Abstract

When I refer to the judicial individualization of the measures that are imposed on young people for the commission of criminal acts, that is, to the activity carried out by the Juvenile Judge to determine which measure will be imposed and for how long, I want to place myself in an area of Juvenile Criminal Law that seems confusing, if not arbitrary, in its practical application.
Such confusion is due to the unidirectional use of a strictly legalistic interpretative criterion that reigns in the praxis of this special plot of jurisdiction; Although there is, in my opinion, in the special legal regime of minors a normative framework that allows a different interpretation that I propose here.