The primary export model: The historical roots of fiscal regressivity in Honduras (1876-1931)

Authors

  • Carlos Manuel Moreno Núñez Honduras Tax Administration Service (SAR). Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

Keywords:

Enclave economy, Center-periphery relationship, Capital accumulation, Land concessions, Political clientelism, Structural dependence, Tax exemptions

Abstract

The present article analyzes Honduras´s integration into the global capitalist economy in the late 19th century, highlighting the impact of the second industrial revolution and liberal reforms on the development of a dependent economic model. The attraction of foreign capital through tax incentives and concessions facilitated the consolidation of productive enclaves −such as mining and the banana industry− that operated outside the national economy. This dual structure, composed of a dynamic export sector and a stagnant subsistence sector, limited productive diversification and hindered the development of a solid domestic market. The state´s fiscal fragility, exacerbated by the dominance of foreign companies exempt from significant contributions, reinforced wealth inequality and perpetuated a relationship of dependence on transnational capital, shaping the country´s economic and political development throughout the 20th century.

Abstract
185
PDF (Spanish) 181

Author Biography

Carlos Manuel Moreno Núñez, Honduras Tax Administration Service (SAR). Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

Máster en Historia Social y Cultural (UNAH), Analista del Departamento de Estudios Fiscales y Económicos (DEFE) del Servicio de Administración de Rentas (SAR). Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-05

How to Cite

The primary export model: The historical roots of fiscal regressivity in Honduras (1876-1931). (2026). Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 8(8), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5377/rcs.v8i8.22183

Issue

Section

Articulos originales

How to Cite

The primary export model: The historical roots of fiscal regressivity in Honduras (1876-1931). (2026). Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 8(8), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5377/rcs.v8i8.22183