Methodological roadmap for the implementation of the MEIDI model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/rtu.v15i42.23031

Keywords:

educational robotics, meaningful learning, STEAM, secondary teacher education

Abstract

This article analyzes educational robotics as a didactic resource for strengthening secondary teacher education, particularly within the framework of STEAM areas and the development of digital, pedagogical, and socio-emotional competencies. The aim was to identify the skills developed by teachers through educational robotics training processes and to assess the conditions that support its incorporation into pedagogical practice. A qualitative and interpretive systematic literature review was conducted based on publications from 2018 to 2023, retrieved from SciELO, Google Scholar, and LA Referencia. The initial corpus consisted of 47 documents, of which 21 were selected because of their direct relationship with educational robotics, teacher training, and curricular integration.
The findings show that educational robotics contributes to the strengthening of four competency dimensions: technical-digital, pedagogical, cognitive, and socio-emotional. However, the review also identifies important tensions: most studies highlight positive effects on motivation and active learning, but they warn that such benefits depend on teacher training, resource availability, didactic planning, and institutional support. In the Nicaraguan context, experiences in micro-educational robotics and technology provision policies create relevant opportunities, although challenges remain regarding sustainability, continuous training, and the production of local evidence. It is concluded that educational robotics should be understood as a cross-cutting pedagogical strategy rather than merely a technological tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
21
PDF (Español (España)) 6

References

Alimisis, D. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics: The ROBOESL project paradigm. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9357-0

Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223

Arís, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational robotics in the stage of secondary education: Empirical study on motivation and STEM skills. Education Sciences, 9(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020073

Bordignon, F. R. A., & Iglesias, A. A. (2020). Introducción al pensamiento computacional. UNIPE/UNLP. https://libros.unlp.edu.ar/index.php/unlp/catalog/book/1300

Castro, A. N., Aguilera, C. A., & Chávez, D. (2022). Robótica educativa como herramienta para la enseñanza-aprendizaje de las matemáticas en la formación universitaria de profesores de educación básica en tiempos de COVID-19. Formación Universitaria, 15(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062022000200151

Çetin, M., & Demircan, H. Ö. (2020). Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review. Early Child Development and Care, 190(9), 1323-1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844

Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M.-R. A., & Liang, J.-C. (2023). Trends and research foci of robotics-based STEM education: A systematic review from diverse angles based on the technology-based learning model. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00400-3

González-Fernández, M. O., Flores-González, Y. A., & Muñoz-López, C. (2021). Panorama de la robótica educativa a favor del aprendizaje STEAM. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(2), 2301. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i2.2301

INTEF. (2018). Programación, robótica y pensamiento computacional en el aula: Situación en España y propuesta normativa. Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. https://code.intef.es/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Ponencia-sobre-Pensamiento-Computacional.-Informe-Final.pdf

Martínez, M. C., & Rodríguez Pesce, E. S. (2019). Formación docente en robótica: Una experiencia en un curso semipresencial. Revista Tecnología y Ciencia, (35), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.33414/rtyc.35.82-93.2019

Mejía Quiroz, Á. A., Gutiérrez Marcenaro, H. R., Iglesias, J. A., & Ledezma, A. (2021). Aplicación de las TIC y la Micro Robótica Educativa para el fortalecimiento de los procesos de educación formal y no formal de la FAREM-Carazo, UNAN-Managua. ROBOTIC 1.0. Revista Torreón Universitario, 10(28), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.5377/rtu.v10i28.11527

MINED Nicaragua. (s. f.). Tecnología educativa. https://www.mined.gob.ni/mapadelaeducacion/tecnologia-educativa/

Moreno, B. (2018). Systematic reviews: Definition and basic notions. International Journal of Odontostomatology, 12(3), 184-186. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci _arttext&pid=S0719-01 072018000300184

Rodrigo Parra, J. (2021). Robótica para la inclusión educativa: Una revisión sistemática. RiiTE Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, (11), 150-171. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.492211

Schina, D., Esteve-González, V., & Usart, M. (2021). An overview of teacher training programs in educational robotics: Characteristics, best practices and recommendations. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2831-2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10377-

Published

2026-06-12

How to Cite

Narváez Casanova, Y. N. (2026). Methodological roadmap for the implementation of the MEIDI model. Torreon Universitario Magazine, 15(42), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.5377/rtu.v15i42.23031

Issue

Section

Education