Antagonism Between International Law Principles in the Venezuelan Crisis

Abstract

The scientific article pretends to develop from an analytic-reflexive point of view, to provide a broad and significative panorama attending the actual juridical situation in the branch of the international law that affects the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, considering the repercussion that can arouse the foreign policies and particular interests that the international actors like China, Russia and the United States of America have in the internal crisis of this south american nation, delimiting our analysis to determine the international law principles that these global powered nations determine to apply in there foreign policies towards the international community of nations based on the internal political entanglement of Venezuela, taking in consideration the supposed shortage of minimal inputs that every human being is entitled to in the field of human rights.

In the same order of ideas of our thematic, will be developed taking in consideration the evolutive phenomenon of the territorial unity of a State as it is determined by the 1514 Resolution promulgated by the General Assembly of the United Nations, focusing in the intrinsic relation of the national unity within the political unity of a country, referring to the innovative international phenomenon denominated hypothesis of political duality in the legal framework of the external auto determination from one country to another, focusing the analysis the political-legal point of the view of the international law in the internal crisis or conflict of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela that generates the antagonism between the principle of self-determination of the people and the principle of responsibility to protect.