Ethnographic contributions to the anthropology of religious experience: corporality, emotions and subjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5377/raices.v5i10.13599Keywords:
ethnography, religion, corporeality, emotions and subjectivationAbstract
For this project, the question we have worked with since 2020 was: in what way has religion affected us - our own religious experiences or those of others - in our anthropological work? This question refers directly to our field work and to the type of anthropology that we elaborate later. Or, put another way, what do these experiences mean that we later put aside in our writings, and in what way did they re-mean our understanding of the anthropological exercise? Still a little further: how did they modify our subjectivity and what impact did it have on our ways of positioning ourselves in the world? However, beyond an exercise in autoethnography in which we situate ourselves with our identities in the field, an anthropology of the experience of religion as we finally call it, places us in a more complex task.
Downloads
415
References
Asad, T. (202). The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category . En M. Lambek, Anthropology of Religion, (págs. 114-132). London: Blackwell Publishing.
Bizerril, J. (2013). Religión y modos de subjetivación en el mundo globalizado. . Nómadas(39), 181-195.
Csordas, T. (1990). Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos, 5-47.
Forero, A. M. (2010). Beyond Ethnographic writing. . Italia: Armando Editore.
Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature: . New York: Routledge.
Hoel, N. (2013). Embodying the field: a researcher’s reflections on power dynamics, positionality and the nature of research relationships. Fieldwork in Religion, 27- 49.
Kontos, P. (2004). Embodied selfhood: an ethnographic exploration of alzheimer’s disease. Thinking about dementia. Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility. 195-217.
Mahmud, H. (2021). “How can you be so naive?” Negotiating insider status among co-ethnic migrants in global ethnographic fieldwork. Fiel guide for research in community settings. Tools, methods, challenges and strategies. 50-65.
Pandolfi, L. (2010). Why ethnography? Critical questions regarding cognitive intentionality in anthropology.
Rangel Lara, T. (2021). CIESAS Occidente. Obtenido de Conferencia: Encarnar el objeto de estudio: aproximaciones a la autoetnografía.: Video de Youtube: https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v=177983957460441&ref=watch_permalink
Toncheva, S. y. (2021). Knowing bears: an ethnographic study of knowledge and agency in human-bear cohabita
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 © Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, Managua, UNAN-Managua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.