The BRICS in the geoeconomic environment

Authors

  • Roberto Antonio Morán Universidad Francisco Gavidia
  • Rolando Balmore Pacheco Universidad Francisco Gavidia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/ryr.v0i46.5504

Keywords:

Economic bloc, geopolitics, economy, emergent market economic, commercial order.

Abstract

This article makes an analysis of the evolution of the economic and political group nominated in 2001 by Jim O'Neill of Goldman Sachs as the BRICS, an acronym for an association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China and as of 2009 South Africa. The article addresses the origin and expectations with which the group was born, its current and prospective situation of being the driving force of a new economic, political and commercial order at a global level. Finally, the authors present some conclusions of the analysis that pose possibilities and obstacles, which as a block in general -and as countries in particular- should be considered for their geoeconomic, commercial and political consolidation.

Reality and Reflection Year 17, No 46, July-December 2017; 13-21

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
2719
PDF (Español (España)) 4781

Author Biographies

Roberto Antonio Morán, Universidad Francisco Gavidia

Licenciado en Economía por la Universidad de El SalvadorMaster en Administración y Dirección de Empresas por la Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas Estudiante de Doctorado en Gestión Pública y Ciencias Empresariales del Instituto Centroamericano de Administración Pública (ICAP)  

Rolando Balmore Pacheco, Universidad Francisco Gavidia

Licenciado en Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Francisco Gavidia
Postítulo en Población y Desarrollo, Universidad de Chile
Máster en Educación por la Universidad de Louisville, Estados Unidos
Estudiante de Doctorado en Gestión Pública y Ciencias Empresariales del Instituto Centroamericano de Administración Pública (ICAP)

Published

2017-12-23

How to Cite

Morán, R. A., & Pacheco, R. B. (2017). The BRICS in the geoeconomic environment. Reality and Reflection, (46), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.5377/ryr.v0i46.5504