Teacher training in El Salvador: implications in salvadoran education

Authors

  • Óscar Luna Universidad Francisco Gavidia
  • Jeser Caleb Candray Universidad Francisco Gavidia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5377/ryr.v50i50.9091

Keywords:

Education, teacher training, El Salvador

Abstract

The aim of this article is to establish a dialogue on the different visions of teacher education in El Salvador and its implications for education. For this, it was decided to interview different personalities who know about the issue, either because of their current status as a public official or because they are part of training processes, or because they are teachers, which will allow, in the opinion of the authors, to broaden the debate and thus give different edges to the subject in question. To begin this article, we will present, roughly, the current state of teacher training in the country. After this legal / historical framework, the interviews conducted with the selected officials, the teachers and the teacher educator will be presented. The interviews were conducted separately during the year 2018 and 2019 being recorded and textualized. Finally, after the interviews a small analysis of the contributions of the interviewees is made. It is expected with the publication of the article to encourage critical debate on teacher training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
750
PDF (Español (España)) 2921

Author Biographies

Óscar Luna, Universidad Francisco Gavidia

Director de la revista Disruptiva del Instituto de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de la Universidad Francisco Gavidia (ICTI-UFG).

Jeser Caleb Candray, Universidad Francisco Gavidia

Máster en Educación en Ciencia y en Matemática por la Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR). Investigador del Instituto de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de la Universidad Francisco Gavidia (ICTI-UFG).

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

Luna, Óscar, & Candray, J. C. (2019). Teacher training in El Salvador: implications in salvadoran education. Reality and Reflection, 50(50), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.5377/ryr.v50i50.9091