Traducción: La Declaración de Sídney: Revisando la esencia de la ciencia forense a través de sus principios fundamentales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5377/rcfh.v10i2.20378Palabras clave:
Trazas, Principios, Indicios, Contexto, Asimetría temporal, Incertidumbre, Ética, Pensamiento crítico, Razonamiento lógicoResumen
En virtud de la importancia que, para la comunidad forense, tiene la perspectiva de las ciencias forenses planteada en el artículo publicado por Roux y Col. 2022, la Editora de la RCFH, considero importante traducir al español este trabajo y ponerlo a disposición de nuestros lectores.
Este artículo es la traducción al español del documento original en inglés, titulado: “The Sydney Declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles”, escrito por Claude Roux, Rebecca Bucht, Frank Crispino, Peter De Forest, Chris Lennard, Pierre Margot, Michelle D. Miranda, Niamh NicDaeid, Olivier Ribaux, Alastair Ross y Sheila Willis, y publicado en la revista Forensic Science International, volumen 332, año 2022, cuyo original está disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111182
La traducción fue realizada en marzo del 2024 por Luis Jiro Suzuri Hernández y Alexa Villavicencio Queijeiro, de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Forenses de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, y fue revisado, editado y corregido por la Licda. Valeria Alexandra Alonzo Matamoros egresada de la carrera de lenguas extranjeras, de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras.
Se agradece a Claude Roux, por brindarnos su autorización para publicar la traducción al español en nuestra revista.
Descargas
475
HTML 29
Citas
1.-Margot P. Forensic science on trial - what is the law of the land?. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2011;43(2–3):89–103. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2011.555418.
2.- Mnookin JL. The Uncertain Future of Forensic Science. Daedalus. [Internet]. 2018 [citado 12 enero 2024]; 147(4):99-118. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3300354.
3.-National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington: The National Academies Press, 2009.
4.- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. [Internet]. Washington: Executive Office of the President;2016. [citado 12 enero 2024]. Disponible: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf
5.- Houck MM. Backlogs are a dynamic system, not a warehousing problem. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020;2:317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.10.003.
6.- Crispino F, Roux CP. Forensic-led regulation strategies: are they fit for security problem solving purposes?. In: Rossy Q, Décary-Hétu D, Delémont O, Mulone M, Editores. The Routledge International Handbook of Forensic Intelligence and Criminology. Abingdon(UK): Routledge; 2017 p. 65-76.
7.- Ross A, Neuteboom W. Implementation of quality management from a historical perspective:the forensic science odyssey. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2021;53(3):359-371. doi:10.1080/00450618.2019.1704058
8.-Ross A, Neuteboom W. ISO-accreditation - is that all there is for forensic science? Aust. J Forensic Sci. 2020; 54(2):1-13.
9.- Willis S. Accreditation - straight belt or life jacket? Presentation to Forensic Science Society Conference November 2013. Sci Justice. 2014;54(6):505-507. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.06.001.
10.- Cooper GS, Meterko V. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. [Internet]. 2019 [citado 12 enero 2024];297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016.
11.- Forensic Science Regulator Guidance. Cognitive Bias Effects Relevant to Forensic Science Examination. [Internet]. Birmingham(UK): The Forensic Science Regulator; 2020. [citado 12 enero 2024]. Disponible en: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/914259/217_FSR-G-217_Cognitive_bias_appendix_Issue_2.pdf
12.-Buzzini P, Kammrath BW, De Forest P. Trace Evidence? The term trace from adjective to noun. WIREs Forensic Sci. 2019; 1:e1342. doi: 10.1002/wfs2.1342.
13.- Eldridge H. Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019;1:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.001.
14.-European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. Guideline for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science - Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe (STEOFRAE) [Internet]. Wiesbaden(DE): ENFSI;2010. [citado 12 enero 2024]. Disponible en: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/m1_guideline.pdf
15.- National Institute of Forensic Science Australia New Zealand. An introductory guide to Evaluative Reporting [Internet]. Melbourne (AU):NIFS;2017. [citado 12 enero 2024]. Disponible en: https://roebuckforensics.com.au/document/enfsi-guideline-for-evaluative-reporting-in-forensic-science/
16.- Black S, Nic Daeid N. Time to think differently: catalysing a paradigm shift in forensic science. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1674):20140251. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0251
17.-O'Brien É, Nic Daeid N, Black S. Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. [Internet]. 2015 [citado 12 enero 2024];370(1674):20150062. Disponible en: https://doi:.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0062
18.- Roux C, Ribaux O, Crispino F. Forensic science 2020 – the end of the crossroads?. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2018; 50(6):607-618. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2018.1485738
19.-Weyermann C, Roux C. A different perspective on the forensic science crisis. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;323:110779. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110779
20.- Roux C, Willis S, Weyermann C. Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? Sci Justice. 2021;61(6):678-686. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.08.005
21.- Kirk PL. The Ontogeny of Criminalistics. J Crim Law Criminol Police Sci. 1963; 54(2):235-238.
22.- Crispino F, Ribaux O, Houck, M, Margot P. Forensic science - A true science?. Aust J Forensic Sci. 43(2/3): 157-176. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2011.555416
23.- Crispino F, Roux C, Delémont O, Ribaux O. Is the (traditional) Galilean science paradigm well suited to forensic science?. WIREs forensic Sci. 2019;1:e1349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1349
24.-De Forest PR. Recapturing the essence of criminalistics. Sci Justice. 1999;39(3):196-208. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(99)72047-2.
25.- Inman K, Rudin N. Principles and Practice of Criminalistics The Profession of Forensic Science. Florida: CRC Press;2001.
26.-Margot P. Traceology, the bedrock of forensic science and its associated semantics. In: Rossy Q, Décary-Hétu D, Delémont O, Mulone M, editores. The Routledge International Handbook of Forensic Intelligence and Criminology. Abingdon (UK): Routledge International Handbook; 2017. p. 30-39.
27.- Miranda MD. The trace in the technique: Forensic science and the Connoisseur's gaze. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021;3:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100203
28.- Ristenbatt RR 3rd, Hietpas J, De Forest PR, Margot PA. Traceology, criminalistics, and forensic science. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67(1):28-32. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14860
29.- Margot P. Traçologie: la trace, vecteur fondamental de la police scientifique. Rev Int Criminol. De Police Tech Sci. 2014; 67(1):72-97.
30.-Hazard Đ, Margot P. Forensic Science Culture. En: Bruinsma, G, Weisburd D, editores. Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York: Springer;2014. p 1782-1795.
31.- Locard E. L’enquête criminelle et les méthodes scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion; 1920.
32.- Crispino F. Le principe de Locard est-il scientifique ? Ou analyse de la scientificité des príncipes fondamentaux de la criminalistique. [Tesis Doctoral]. Lausanne (CH): Université de Lausanne;2006.
33.-Schuliar Y, Crispino F. Semiotics, heuristics, and inferences used by forensic scientists. In: Siegel JA, Saukko PJ, editores. Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. 2ª. ed. Waltham(US): Academic Press; 2013. p. 310-313.
34.-De Forest PR. Crime Scene Investigation. In: Sullivan LE, Rosen MS, Schulz DM, Haberfeld MR, editores. Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement. Thousand Oaks (US): Sage Publications; 2005. p. 112-116.
35.- Voisard R. L’empreinte photographique de l’imagerie judiciaire - De la sémiotique aux applications pédagogiques. [Tesis]. Lausanne(CH): University of Lausanne;2020.
36.- Jaquet-Chiffelle DO, Casey E. A formalized model of the Trace. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;327:110941. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110941
37.-Cleland CE. Prediction and explanation in historical natural science. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 2011; 62(3): 551-582. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axq024
38.- Goldstein H. Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach. Crime & Delinquency. 1979; 25(2), 236-258.
39.- Crispino F, Weyermann C, Delémont O, Roux C, Ribaux O. Towards another paradigm for forensic science?. WIRES Forensic Sci. 2022; 4(2):e1441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1441
40.- Kwan Q. Inference of Identity of Source. Berkeley(US):Berkeley University;1976.
41.- Cleland C. Methodological and epistemic differences between historical science and experimental science. Philos Sci. 2002; 69(3):474-496. doi:10.1086/342455
42.- Currie A. Rock, bone, and ruin: An optimist's guide to the historical sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press;2024.
43.- Cadola L, Charest M, Lavallée C, Crispino F. The occurrence and genesis of transfer traces in forensic science: a structured knowledge database. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 2021; 54(2): 86-100. doi:10.1080/00085030.2021.1890941
44.- Casey E, Ribaux O, Roux C. The Kodak Syndrome: Risks and Opportunities Created by Decentralization of Forensic Capabilities. J Forensic Sci. 2019;64(1):127-136. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13849.
45.- Baechler S, Morelato M, Gittelson S, Walsh S, Margot P, Roux C et al. Breaking the barriers between intelligence, investigation and evaluation: A continuous approach to define the contribution and scope of forensic science. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;309:110213. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110213.
46.-Ribaux O, Talbot Wright B. Expanding forensic science through forensic intelligence. Sci Justice. 2014;54(6):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.05.001.
47.- Ribaux O, Crispino F, Roux C. Forensic intelligence: deregulation or return to the roots of forensic science? Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2015;47(1):61-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2014.906656
48.- Morelato M, Baechler S, Ribaux O, Beavis A, Tahtouh M, Kirkbride P, et al. Forensic intelligence framework--Part I: Induction of a transversal model by comparing illicit drugs and false identity documents monitoring. Forensic Sci Int. 2014;236:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.045
49.- Ribaux O, Crispino F, Delémont O, Roux C. The progressive opening of forensic science towards criminological concerns. Security J. 2016;29(4):543-560. doi:10.1057/sj.2015.29.
50.- Rossy Q, Décary-Hétu D, Delémont O, Mulone M. The Routledge International Handbook of Forensic Intelligence and Criminology. Abingdon(UK): Routledge; 2017
51.- Roux C, Crispino F, Ribaux O. From Forensics to Forensic Science. Curr. Issues Crim Justice. 2012;24(1):7-24.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Luis Jiro Suzuri Hernández, Alexa Villavicencio Queijeiro; Valeria Alexandra Alonzo Matamoros
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
El autor conserva los derechos de autor bajo los terminos de una licencia CC NC 4.0
