La Evaluación de Proyectos Integradores de Saberes en la UNAN-Managua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5377/recoso.v4i8.18610Keywords:
Knowledge Integrator Product (PIS), Curricular integration, Evaluation as a process, Guiding Base for ActionAbstract
This unique study of its kind at the university level and
at the country level, refers to the experience lived by
teachers and students in the process of evaluation
of the Integrating Knowledge Product (PIS). The
importance of the study lies in the fact that today
universities in general and UNAN-Managua in particular
have established the PIS as strategic instruments to
train future professionals with the necessary skills to
solve social problems and face uncertainty. In them
the quality of the learning achieved and to be achieved
is evidenced and from this, improve them.
Methodologically, the work is circumscribed in the
qualitative-phenomenological-descriptive paradigm
in which 30 teachers and 30 students from 10 defense
teams and from three different careers of the Faculty
of Economic Sciences participated, providing the
primary source of the study, the secondary source was
It was obtained by resorting to academic Google and
the indexed journals generated by the search engine,
for which some Boolean resources were used to
accurately manage updated and reliable information
on the subject in question. The analysis of the data was
made from the results obtained, the information from
a secondary source and later contrasted, with respect
to the theoretical basis.
In the Results, it was possible to verify the advances
in the curricular integration mainly in what refers to
Planning and organization of the evaluation, not so in
the execution, and evaluation of the process, where
application weaknesses were observed, nuanced
by lack of will of the teaching staff, at the same time
allowed to observe the learning achieved by the
students of cognitive aspects typical of the first year,
through the student performance of the I and II (Both
of the I semester 2022). It is concluded that greater
leadership, organization, better control and evaluation
by the directors of the teaching departments are
necessary, before, during and after the construction
process of the PIS and in general of the evaluation.
134